• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has started accepting cryptocurrency as a payment possibility, the company announced in the present day. The positioning now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded version of Dogecoindark, which cut up off from the original meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, customers pays for any Pornhub features, together with a Premium subscription, using Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s grownup sister sites, Brazzers and Nutaku, additionally accept Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-centered, which is why Pornhub executives say they chose it over different potential companions. It must be noted that anybody can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions through its public ledger, nevertheless it uses the anonymity device Tor and an anonymous community layer I2P to cover particular transactions’ IP addresses and locations. Since public ledgers usually have their downfalls in defending anonymity, customers additionally select to cover on Verge cryptocurrency’s private ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency gives "convenience and safety." It’s a dubious statement, considering most digital coins have high transaction fees and volatile prices that is usually a problem for customers. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency assist for those very causes. Stripe has even gone so far as including cryptocurrency to its prohibited businesses checklist. Verge cryptocurrency has been pretty volatile, like other standard digital coins. 0.22 per coin however has since dropped back down. On the heels of this announcement at present, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which continues to be low in comparison with more fashionable digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been looking at crypto for quite some time," says Price, including that Pornhub’s associate sites did settle for restricted cryptocurrencies again when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital forex. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of the sites to incorporate cryptocurrency as a cost methodology back then, seemingly because Bitcoin’s prices have been nonetheless low.

Inventions that were ahead of their time will help us to know whether we're really ready to reside on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that signify a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the actual world is almost precisely the same; that’s why invention is a danger. After we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of help it may have on the earth in which it emerges and the facility it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And although anyone focused on a pill had in all probability been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one thing that really ready the world for the pill computer was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world during which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which are commonplace in the present day made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly ready and so they weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report instructed us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did threat its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast loss of life after a well known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us want.