• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s dad or mum firm with concerns over content material that includes underaged children. As recently reported, an employee for the company was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When importing content material to the positioning, customers are required to submit a photograph ID but will not be required to show their face in the uploaded material. The employee admitted there is no technique to verify the individual importing the picture ID is similar individual within the content material. He replied, "Of course," when asked if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content material of their victims to generate income. As you're conscious, numerous Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are involved that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and possibly other subsidiaries, may be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM by means of the ‘loophole’ identified by your worker. Please present us with a proof of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in actual fact, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, in that case, whether Aylo is taking measures to alter this policy to make sure that no kids or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time may help us to understand whether we are truly able to live in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know that you may create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the true world is sort of precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. After we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it will have in the world wherein it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally signifies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet computer, though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological growth supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And though anybody serious about a tablet had probably been ready for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one thing that actually prepared the world for the pill pc was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small mobile display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies which are commonplace right this moment made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and xhamster controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, of course; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or really successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to only weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick demise after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, each major tech company is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then again and again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, like the precise first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gasoline powered car car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental thought of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.