• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Mindy Seu (b. 1991, California) is a designer and technologist based in New York City. Her expanded practice entails archival projects, techno-critical writing, performative lectures, design commissions, and shut collaborations. Her newest writing surveys feminist economies, historic precursors of the metaverse, and the materiality of the web. Mindy’s ongoing Cyberfeminism Index, which gathers three many years of on-line activism and internet artwork, was commissioned by Rhizome, offered at the new Museum, and awarded the Graham Foundation Grant. She has lectured internationally at cultural establishments (Barbican Centre, New Museum), tutorial establishments (Columbia University, Central Saint Martins), and mainstream platforms (Pornhub, SSENSE, Google), and been a resident at MacDowell, Sitterwerk Foundation, Pioneer Works, and Internet Archive. Her design commissions and consultation include projects for the Serpentine Gallery, Canadian Centre for Architecture, and MIT Media Lab. Her work has been featured in Frieze, Dazed, Gagosian Quarterly, Brooklyn Rail, i-D, and more. Mindy holds an M.Des. Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a B.A. Design Media Arts from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is presently Assistant Professor at Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts and Critic at Yale School of Art.

Now, take a moment to watch a few of the demo. I ask you, is that not an impressive factor? Does it not look pretty nice, even by today’s standards? By all measures, it was a technical marvel and an excellent consumer expertise. However it failed - bitterly. Bell Telephone’s plans for the PicturePhone had been formidable, if not outright delusional. The price of a PicturePhone plan was $160/month. Today, flagship mobile phones sell at round $one thousand a bit, but might you imagine paying that value every month for service? That’s what $160 would have felt like in 1970. Bell arrange PicturePhone booths in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. 20/minute to use them. When was the last time you dropped $one hundred fifty in a vending machine? That’s the type of expense we’re talking about. As batshit as the economics of the PicturePhone were, Bell’s goal was to construct a $1 Billion company - 100,000 PicturePhones in the primary 5 years; 1,000,000 by 1980; 12,000,000 by 2000. Despite making a great piece of tools and actually dazzling the technorati of the time by making it work nicely over old, twisted copper wire, that was by no means going to happen.

Today, it’s easy to ask why Bell wouldn’t have just subsidized the product within the early days to build the market. The answer is regulation. At the time, Bell owned a lot of the infrastructure - the network over which the PicturePhone was transmitting. Taking a loss on the gadget to lock in clients would have triggered an enormous antitrust case, and effectively, back then firms actually cared about that form of factor and so did the government. So, the PicturePhone was forced to be exorbitantly expensive. Though an economic misfit, the PicturePhone was a superb machine and a fair better catalyst. Researchers at Bell Labs knew that a digital future was at hand, and that new infrastructure can be required to help it. Several years before the PicturePhone was released, Bell produced a movie representing their view of the longer term, known as Seeing the Digital Future, which anticipated so much of today’s digital and web-pushed tradition.

Creating the PicturePhone allowed them to experiment with among the interactions they expected would turn into commonplace, whereas also demonstrating the necessity for upgraded infrastructure. That Bell engineers were in a position to deliver a gadget that transmitted stable sound and picture over existing telelphone strains was extraordinary. That they were in a position to create such a compact, desk-prepared system that was appropriate with the telephones already sitting on them was also. That the PicturePhone had a digicam that used real glass optics and was refocusable and repositionable remotely makes me covet it, even now. Beyond these options, the PicturePhone released in 1970 anticipated much of today’s web expertise. Fluid and frequent digital connections between people, absolutely, but additionally the multimedia nature of how we change info right now. Bell added video to what had been a completely auditory connection expertise to this point, but additionally they built add-ons to connect PicturePhone to mainframe computers, share slides over the display screen, and even a mirror module that will allow the unit’s camera to broadcast documents you had in your desk.

Undeniably cool, although admittedly area of interest for the time. Bell hoped that gaining a country’s value of subscribers would pressure a nationwide upgrade in digital infrastructure. As it would prove, even the web, as we understand it at the moment, wouldn’t try this. We might must distribute credit for making the common American understand the need for fiber optic cable amongst a diverse constituency - from Google to Pornhub. Pricing and infrastructure could be blamed for xhamster what would become a $500 million loss for Bell Telephone. Even that quantity doesn’t actually describe how much of a misfire the PicturePhone was compared with the truth that in the primary 6 months, solely 12 customers subscribed to the service, and by the time it was officially canceled, it had precisely zero of these prospects left. But even in 1970, there have been more than 12 individuals rich enough to be early adopters. So why didn’t they?