• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s dad or mum firm with issues over content that includes underaged youngsters. As lately reported, an employee for the company was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content material to the location, customers are required to submit a photo ID however are usually not required to indicate their face in the uploaded material. The employee admitted there is no solution to verify the individual importing the photograph ID is the same individual within the content material. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content material of their victims to earn money. As you might be aware, numerous Federal and state laws forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We're concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and presumably other subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM by way of the ‘loophole’ recognized by your worker. Please present us with an explanation of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in actual fact, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, if so, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to change this policy to make sure that no kids or other victims are being abused for revenue on any of its platforms.

Inventions that have been forward of their time can assist us to grasp whether or not we're actually able to live on the planet we are making. Speculative fiction followers know which you could create a whole world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the true world is sort of exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it will have on the earth during which it emerges and the ability it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, even though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anybody curious about a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that actually ready the world for the tablet pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one prepared for a bridge machine between a small cell display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which might be commonplace today made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite prepared and so they weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, in fact; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary really good or really successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did risk its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick loss of life after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, each main tech firm is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then time and again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, just like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gasoline powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, nevertheless it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental concept of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would power us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.