• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Pornhub has began accepting cryptocurrency as a fee option, the company announced in the present day. The location now accepts Verge cryptocurrency (no relation to The Verge), a rebranded version of Dogecoindark, which cut up off from the original meme coin, Dogecoin, in 2014. Now, customers pays for any Pornhub features, including a Premium subscription, using Verge cryptocurrency. Pornhub’s adult sister sites, Brazzers and Nutaku, additionally settle for Verge cryptocurrency now. Verge cryptocurrency is anonymity-centered, which is why Pornhub executives say they selected it over other potential companions. It needs to be famous that anybody can view Verge cryptocurrency transactions via its public ledger, nevertheless it makes use of the anonymity device Tor and an anonymous community layer I2P to cover particular transactions’ IP addresses and locations. Since public ledgers usually have their downfalls in protecting anonymity, customers also choose to hide on Verge cryptocurrency’s non-public ledger. Corey Price, VP at Pornhub, tells The Verge that cryptocurrency gives "convenience and safety." It’s a dubious statement, considering most digital coins have excessive transaction charges and unstable prices that could be a trouble for users. Companies like Valve and Stripe have ended their cryptocurrency assist for those very reasons. Stripe has even gone as far as adding cryptocurrency to its prohibited companies record. Verge cryptocurrency has been fairly risky, like other widespread digital coins. 0.22 per coin but has since dropped back down. On the heels of this announcement at the moment, it rose to about 10 cents per coin, which is still low in comparison with extra popular digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. "We’ve been taking a look at crypto for fairly some time," says Price, including that Pornhub’s companion sites did settle for restricted cryptocurrencies again when Bitcoin had newly emerged as a digital currency. Still, Pornhub wasn’t one of the sites to incorporate cryptocurrency as a fee method again then, doubtless as a result of Bitcoin’s prices were nonetheless low.

Inventions that were forward of their time may help us to know whether or not we're truly able to live in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know which you could create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is almost precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of assist it can have on the planet wherein it emerges and the power it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill computer, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological development supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anyone enthusiastic about a tablet had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the pill laptop was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world by which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to mobile computing is one prepared for a bridge system between a small mobile display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which might be commonplace right this moment made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly prepared and so they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years before Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identity on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick dying after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us want.